Official Journal Health Science of Prince of Songkla University

  • Home
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Guide for Authors
  • Publication Ethics
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit
  • About
  • Contact
  • Online-first Articles
  • EVENTS
  • Review Process
Home > Vol 37, No 1 (2019) > Kanjanapradit

P-cadherin and CD10 Expression to Distinguish between Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast

Kanet Kanjanapradit, Sittipong Wangsawibul

Abstract

Objective: To use placental cadherin (P-cadherin) and cluster of differentiation 10 (CD10) immunohisto chemical staining, to separate ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
Material and Methods: DCIS (n=48), equivocal (n=18), and IDC grade 1 (n=17) cases were evaluated by using immunohisto chemical staining, with P-cadherin and CD10 for identifying the myoepithelial cells.
Results: P-cadherin is positive in myoepithelial cells in almost all cases of DCIS (79.0%), and equivocal groups (61.0%). CD10 also shows a positive result in most cases of DCIS (98.0%) along with equivocal groups (72.0%). Both, P-cadherin and CD10 are negative in all cases of IDC grade 1. P-cadherin shows a high percentage of positivity in luminal cell in DCIS (83.0%), equivocal group (100.0%) and IDC grade 1 (88.0%). CD10 shows a low positive in the luminal cell of most cases of DCIS (13.0%), equivocal group (6.0%) and IDC grade 1 (0.0%). CD10 is positive in myofibroblastic cells in approximately 30.0% of all cases, but P-cadherin shows all negative staining.
Conclusion: P-cadherin and CD10 show high sensitivity for detecting the myoepithelial cells, but P-cadherin has a lower specificity, due to it having more luminal cells expression. Therefore, P-cadherin may be helpful for diagnosis in some cases that have a high expression of CD10 in myofibroblastic cells.

 Keywords

CD10; ductal carcinoma in situ; invasive ductal carcinoma; myoepithelial cell, P-cadherin

 Full Text:

PDF

References

International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. GLOBOCAN 2012 cancer fact sheets [homepage on the Internet]. Lyon CEDEX: IARA; 2012 [cited 2014 Jul 14]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx

Lester SC. The breast. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC, editors. Robbin and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2014;p.1043-71.

Ellis IO, Cornelisse CJ, Schnitt SJ, Sasco AJ, Sastre-Garau X, Kaaks R, et al. Invasive breast carcinoma. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. Pathology and genetics of tumors of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press;2003;p.13-23.

National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): treatment options for ductal carcinoma in situ [homepage on the Internet]. Bethesda: NCI; 2014 [cited 2014 Jul 20]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/Patient/page6

National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): treatment options by stage [homepage on the Internet]. Bethesda: NCI; 2014 [cited 2014 Jul 20]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/Patient/page8

Lerwill MF. Current practical applications of diagnostic immunohistochemistry in breast pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:1076–91.

Hicks DG. Immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic evaluation of breast lesions. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2011;19:501–5.

Mukai K, Iwaya K. CD10 expression in normal breast and breast cancer tissues. In: Hayat MA, editor. Handbook of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization of human varcinomas; molecular genetics; lung and breast carcinomas. Burlington: Elsevier; 2004;p.299-305.

Moritani S, Kushima R, Sugihara H, Bamba M, Kobayashi TK, Hattori T. Availability of CD10 immunohistochemistry as a marker of breast myoepithelial cells on paraffin sections. Mod Pathol 2002;15:397–405.

Kalof AN, Tam D, Beatty B, Cooper K. Immunostaining patterns of myoepithelial cells in breast lesions: a comparison of CD10 and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:625–9.

Paredes J, Correia AL, Ribeiro AS, Albergaria A, Milanezi F, Schmitt FC. P-cadherin expression in breast cancer: a review. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9:214.

Albergaria A, Ribeiro AS, Vieira AF. P-cadherin role in normal breast development and cancer. Int J Dev Biol 2011;55:811–22.

Han AC. Role of cadherins in breast cancer. In: Hayat MA, editor. Handbook of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization of human carcinomas, volume 1 molecular genetics; lung and breast carcinomas. Burlington: Elsevier; 2004;p.343-9

Peralta SA, Knudsen KA, Salazar H, Han AC, Keshgegian AA. P-cadherin expression in breast carcinoma indicates poor survival. Cancer 1999;86:1263–72.

Paredes J, Milanezi F, Viegas L, Amendoeira I, Schmitt F. P-cadherin expression is associated with high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Virchows Arch 2002;440:16–21.

Liu N, Yu Q, Liu TJ, Gebreamlak EP, Wang SL, Zhang RJ, et al. P-cadherin expression and basal-like subtype in breast cancers. Med Oncol 2012;29:2606–12.

Gamallo C, Moreno-Bueno G, Sarrió D, Calero F, Hardisson D, Palacios J. The prognostic significance of P-cadherin in infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2001;14:650–4.

Turashvili G, McKinney SE, Goktepe O, Leung SC, Huntsman DG, Gelmon KA, et al. P-cadherin expression as a prognostic biomarker in a 3,992 case tissue microarray series of breast cancer. Mod Pathol 2011;24:64–81.

Kovacs A, Walker R. P-cadherin as a marker in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:139–41.

Bhatia Y. P-cadherin as myoepithelial cell marker for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2013;56:6–9.

Palacios J, Benito N, Pizarro A, Suarez A, Espada J, Cano A. Anomalous expression of P-Cadherin in breast carcinoma correlation with E-cadherin expression and pathological features. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;146:605–12.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.201936

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SUBMIT A PAPER

JHSMR accepts online submission through

AHR-iCON 2024

Journal Metrics


2020
Acceptance rate: 52%
2021
Acceptance rate: 27.8%
2022 (March)
Acceptance rate: 15.6%
2023 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23.6%


Submission to final decision
74 days

Acceptance to publication
40 days

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

About The Authors

Kanet Kanjanapradit
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,
Thailand

Sittipong Wangsawibul
Institute of Pathology, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand

Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)

Supported by

 

JHSMR now Indexed in



Scopus logo.svg






Image result for crossref





PSUMJ Homepage

Keywords COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Thailand Vietnam anxiety children computed tomography depression diabetes elderly factors hypertension knowledge mental health mortality prevalence quality of life risk factor risk factors treatment validity
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
Font Size

Open Journal Systems