Official Journal Health Science of Prince of Songkla University

  • Home
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Guide for Authors
  • Publication Ethics
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit
  • About
  • Contact
  • Online-first Articles
  • EVENTS
  • Review Process
Home > Online-first > Yaowmaneerat

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage Versus Ercp in Inoperable Malignant High-Grade Distal Bile Duct Obstruction: A Randomized Study; Preliminary Analysis

Thanapon Yaowmaneerat, Nisa Netinatsunton, Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Siriboon Attasaranya, Bancha Ovartlarnporn

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) and Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary drainage of high-grade malignant distal bile duct obstruction (HGMDBO).
Material and Methods: Patients with inoperable HGMDBO were randomized to undergo either: EUS-CDS or ERCP. HGMDBO was defined as total bilirubin ≥15 mg/dl and/or a common bile duct size ≥12 mm. The other procedure was performed if the utilized surgery failed: success rates, procedure time and complication rates were assessed.
Results: Preliminary analysis included 10 patients (5 per group); from August 2018 to January 2019, whose demographic data were similar. Technical success rates were at 60% (3/5) vs. 80% (4/5) for EUS-CDS and ERCP, respectively. Clinical success rates were at 80% (4/5) for both. The mean (S.D.) procedure times were 33.72 (14.5) and 45.22 (26.74) min for EUS-CDS and ERCP, respectively, without any significant difference (p-value=0.498). Adverse events in the EUS-CDS group included one case of mild biliary peritonitis and one case of post-sphincterotomy bleeding, while the ERCP group included one case of cholangitis with liver abscess and one case of mild bleeding.
Conclusion: Preliminary data showed similar technical and clinical success rates. EUS-CDS had a shorter mean procedure time than that of ERCP; however, statistical significance was not reached. Further comprehensive studies are needed to validate the role of EUS-CDS as a primary drainage procedure.

 Keywords

Canale and Kelly view; osteoporosis; superimposition; talar neck; tarsal bones

 Full Text:

PDF

References

Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300.

Shepherd HA, Royle G, Ross AP, Diba A, Arthur M, Colin-Jones D. Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis in the palliation of malignant obstruction of the distal common bile duct: a randomized trial. Br J Surg 1988;75:1166-8.

Boulay BR, Parepally M. Managing malignant biliary obstruction in pancreas cancer: choosing the appropriate strategy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:9345-53.

Voegeli DR, Crummy AB, Weese JL. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, drainage, and biopsy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. An alternative to surgery. Am J Surg 1985;150:243-7.

Born P, Rosch T, Triptrap A, Frimberger E, Allescher HD, Ott R, et al. Long-term results of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for benign and malignant bile duct strictures. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998;33:544-9.

Enochsson L, Swahn F, Arnelo U, Nilsson M, Lohr M, Persson G. Nationwide, population-based data from 11,074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish registry for gallstone surgery and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:1175-84.

Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Rolland AL, Moutardier V, Delpero JR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echoendoscope. Endoscopy 2001;33:473-7.

Khashab MA, Dewitt J. EUS-guided biliary drainage: is it ready for prime time? Yes! Gastrointest Endosc 2013;78:102-5.

Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2018;88:9-17.

Park JK, Woo YS, Noh DH, Yang JI, Bae SY, Yun HS, et al. Efficacy of EUS-guided and ERCP-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: prospective randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;88:277-82.

Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, Choi JH, Kim SO, Jang S, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:987-97.

Attasaranya S, Netinasunton N, Jongboonyanuparp T, Sottisuporn J, Witeerungrot T, Pirathvisuth T, et al. The spectrum of endoscopic ultrasound intervention in biliary diseases: a single center’s experience in 31 cases. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012;680753.

Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Asbun H, Bain A, Behrman SW, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017;15:1028-61.

Netinatsunton N, Sottisuporn J. Efficacy of propofol with midazolam and meperidine versus midazolam and meperidine for ERCP by endoscopists with variable experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;3:1121-6.

Lee JW, Han JK, Kim TK, Choi BI, Park SH, Ko YH, et al. Obstructive jaundice in hepatocellular carcinoma: response after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and prognostic factors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2002;25:176-9.

Saluja SS, Gulati M, Garg PK, Pal H, Pal S, Sahni P, et al. Endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage for gallbladder cancer: a randomized trial and quality of life assessment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:944-50.

Committee ASoP, Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:32-47.

Ikeuchi N, Itoi T. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic puncture. Gastrointest Interv 2015;4:31-9.

Iwashita T, Doi S, Yasuda I. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a review. Clin J Gastroenterol 2014; 7:94-102.

Kullman E, Frozanpor F, Soderlund C, Linder S, Sandstrom P, Lindhoff-Larsson A, et al. Covered versus uncovered self-expandable nitinol stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction: results from a randomized, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:915-23.

Vila JJ, Perez-Miranda M, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Abadia MA, Perez-Millan A, Gonzalez-Huix F, et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography for biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: a Spanish national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:1133-41.

Oh D, Park DH, Song TJ, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. Optimal biliary access point and learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2017;10:42-53.

SungYong Han, Seon-Ok Kim, Hoonsub So, Euisoo Shin, Dong Uk Kim, Do Hyun Park. EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for frst-line palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019;9:16551.

Wang K, Zhu J, Xing L, Wang Y, Jin Z, Li Z. Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:1218–27.

Gupta K, Perez-Miranda M, Kahaleh M, Artifon EL, Itoi T, Freeman ML, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-assisted bile duct access and drainage: multicenter, long-term analysis of approach, outcomes, and complications of a technique in evolution. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014;48:80-7.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20251160

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SUBMIT A PAPER

JHSMR accepts online submission through

AHR-iCON 2024

Journal Metrics


2020
Acceptance rate: 52%
2021
Acceptance rate: 27.8%
2022 (March)
Acceptance rate: 15.6%
2023 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23.6%


Submission to final decision
74 days

Acceptance to publication
40 days

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

About The Authors

Thanapon Yaowmaneerat
Nantana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,
Thailand

Nisa Netinatsunton
Nantana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,
Thailand

Tanawat Pattarapuntakul
Nantana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,
Thailand

Siriboon Attasaranya
Nantana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,
Thailand

Bancha Ovartlarnporn
Nantana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan (NKC) Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,
Thailand

Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)

Supported by

 

JHSMR now Indexed in



Scopus logo.svg






Image result for crossref





PSUMJ Homepage

Keywords COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Thailand Vietnam anxiety children computed tomography depression diabetes elderly factors hypertension knowledge mental health mortality prevalence quality of life risk factor risk factors treatment validity
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
Font Size

Open Journal Systems