Exploring Alternative Sweeteners: Consumer Perspectives and Product Development for Healthier and Affordable Choices
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the consumption, consumer experiences, and expectations of alternative sweeteners (AS) among adults. It also developed and assessed a prototype alternative sweetener product (ASP) in terms of acceptability and willingness-to-pay compared to sugar.
Material and Methods: Two studies were conducted. In Study I, a cross-sectional survey assessed consumer experiences and expectations of AS. In Study II, a prototype ASP was developed using erythritol, stevia and sucralose via a geometric dilution method. The ASP was then compared to sugar in snacks and beverages through a single-blinded experiment.
Results: The survey revealed that 63.6% disliked the taste of AS, expecting a sugar-like taste and affordable price. The single-blinded experiment showed no significant differences in overall liking between the ASP and sugar. The cost of the ASP prototype was 88% cheaper than the average marketed AS available in physical markets.
Conclusion: These findings indicate consumer readiness to accept AS, although current market products do not fully meet consumer expectations. The ASP prototype, being more affordable and acceptable, has the potential to reduce barriers related to the affordability and acceptability of AS. The simplicity of the technique used to prepare the ASP prototype also facilitates the transfer of this technology to consumers for home use.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas | Tenth Edition [homepage on the Internet]. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2021 [cited 2023 Nov 8]. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/
Association AD. Introduction: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care 2019;42(Suppl1):S1–2.
Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg EW, Flanders WD, Merritt R, Hu FB. Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among us adults. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:516–24.
WHO. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO; 2015:p.59.
Ministry of Industry. Annual report 2022 Office of the Cane and Sugar Board. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the Cane and Sugar Board; 2022:p.128.
Bertelsen AS, Zeng Y, Mielby LA, Sun YX, Byrne DV, kidmose u. Cross-modal effect of vanilla aroma on sweetness of different sweeteners among chinese and danish consumers. Food Qual Prefer 2021;87:104036.
Bobowski N, Mennella JA. Personal variation in preference for sweetness: effects of age and obesity. Child Obes 2017;13:369–76.
Rojjanawanicharkorn A, Luangpituksa P, Siriwedchayant S, Changcharoen T. The situation of using artificial sweetener instead of sugar in instant beverage powder. J Nutr Asscociation Thail 2017;52:12–22.
Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:1084–102.
Zhang R, Noronha JC, Khan TA, McGlynn N, Back S, Grant SM, et al. The effect of non-nutritive sweetened beverages on postprandial glycemic and endocrine responses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Nutrients 2023;15.
Arumugam B, Subramaniam A, Alagaraj P. Stevia as a natural sweetener: a review. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem 2020;18:94–103.
Shrivastava V, Zafar T. Aspartame: effects and awareness. MedCrave MOJ Toxicol 2017;3:05.
Tey SL, Salleh NB, Henry J, Forde CG. Effects of aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia- and sucrose-sweetened beverages on postprandial glucose, insulin and energy intake. Int J Obes 2005 2017;41:450–7.
Tey SL, Salleh NB, Henry CJ, Forde CG. Effects of non-nutritive (artificial vs natural) sweeteners on 24-h glucose profiles. Eur J Clin Nutr 2017;71:1129–32.
Pielak M, Czarniecka-Skubina E, Trafiałek J, Głuchowski A. Contemporary trends and habits in the consumption of sugar and sweeteners-a questionnaire survey among poles. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16.
Navanukraw C. The Development And Consumers’ Overall Liking Of Sweetener Prototype Product. [Khon Kaen]: Khon Kaen University; 2024:57-8.
Boesten DMPHJ, den Hartog GJM, de Cock P, Bosscher D, Bonnema A, Bast A. Health effects of erythritol. Nutrafoods 2015;14:3–9.
Roberfroid MB. Introducing inulin-type fructans. Br J Nutr 2005;93(Suppl1):S13-25.
Cock P de. Erythritol. In: Sweeteners and Sugar Alternatives in Food Technology [monograph on the Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; [cited 2021 Mar 16]. p.213–41. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118373941.ch10
Ranjan R, Jaiswal J, Jena J. Stevia as a natural sweetener. Int J Res Pharm Chem 2011;1:1199–202.
Edwards CH, Rossi M, Corpe CP, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR. The role of sugars and sweeteners in food, diet and health: Alternatives for the future. Trends Food Sci Technol 2016;56:158–66.
Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis. Nutr Rev 2015;73:643–60.
Ghosh-Dastidar B, Cohen D, Hunter G, Zenk SN, Huang C, Beckman R, et al. Distance to store, food prices, and obesity in urban food deserts. Am J Prev Med 2014;47:587–95.
Neff Warner L, Pinero Walkinshaw L, Oddo VM, Knox MA, Hurvitz PM, Rocha A, et al. The Availability and Price of Healthy Food in Seattle by Neighborhood Sociodemographic Characteristics. Prev Chronic Dis 2022;19:E77.
Muenprasitivej N, Tao R, Nardone SJ, Cho S. The effect of steviol glycosides on sensory properties and acceptability of ice cream. Foods 2022;11:1745.
Laguna L, Primo-Martín C, Salvador A, Sanz T. Inulin and erythritol as sucrose replacers in short-dough cookies: sensory, fracture, and acoustic properties. J Food Sci 2013;78:S777-84.
Gwak MJ, Chung SJ, Kim Y, Lim C. Relative sweetness and sensory characteristics of bulk and intense sweeteners. Food Sci Biotechnol 2012;21.
Parker MN, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA. Consumer acceptance of natural sweeteners in protein beverages. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:8875–89.
Struck S, Jaros D, Brennan CS, Rohm H. Sugar replacement in sweetened bakery goods. Int J Food Sci Technol 2014;49:1963–76.
Hao Y, Wang F, Huang W, Tang X, Zou Q, Li Z, et al. Sucrose substitution by polyols in sponge cake and their effects on the foaming and thermal properties of egg protein. Food Hydrocoll 2016;57:153–9.
Attia ESA, Shehata HA, Askar A. An alternative formula for the sweetening of reduced-calorie cakes. Food Chem 1993;48:169–72.
Akesowan A. Quality of Reduced-Fat Chiffon Cakes Prepared with Erythritol-Sucralose as Replacement for Sugar. Pak J Nutr 2009;8:1383–6.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.